Regression analyses were carried out based only on those texting violations that were significantly correlated with growth in either TROG II, orthographic choice, spelling, or orthographic processing scores. That is, for the basic school infants, we regressed use of unconventional orthographic forms onto growth in functionality on the orthographic choice task; for the secondary school infants, we conducted exam help assorted regression using capitalization quiz help punctuation errors quiz help use of ungrammatical word forms as the predictor variables, quiz help growth in spelling as the outcome variable. Both of these regression models were not massive. The only huge predictive courting found was within the adult sample, where use of ungrammatical word forms accounted for 10. 026. A second regression that used word discounts as exam help predictor for growth in orthographic processing skills was not giant.